Condition-based scope
Base the work package on the observed condition rather than blanket repainting assumptions.
Independent assessment of the existing coating condition, repair needs and project scope—translated into a clear technical bidbook for tendering, budgeting and contractor comparison.
A useful bidbook starts with an accurate onboard assessment—not assumptions based on age, appearance or incomplete maintenance records.
Dekker Coating Consultancy carries out independent superyacht coating condition surveys to establish the present condition of exterior and selected technical coating areas. The survey can be performed deck-by-deck, area-by-area and component-by-component, depending on the intended refit scope.
The findings are translated into a structured refit bidbook that helps shipyards and contractors quote against a common technical basis. This improves scope clarity, budget predictability and comparison of quotations before the vessel enters the yard.
The survey may be commissioned as a standalone pre-refit service or used as the starting point for later specification, tender clarification, execution inspection and final acceptance support.
The purpose is to distinguish what can remain, what requires maintenance, what should be locally repaired and what genuinely needs wider refurbishment.
Base the work package on the observed condition rather than blanket repainting assumptions.
Give invited yards and contractors the same area definitions, repair categories and expectations.
Identify likely repair needs, exclusions and technical uncertainties before execution.
Establish expected technical and cosmetic outcomes before work starts.
Assessment of hull, superstructure, bulwarks, decks, stairways, mast areas and other visible coated surfaces.
Review of gloss, texture, fairness, colour consistency, repair visibility and local finish defects.
Identification of cracking, blistering, delamination, corrosion, edge failure and mechanical damage.
Assessment of visible repair areas, transition quality and recurring defects where identifiable.
DFT, gloss, adhesion, solvent resistance or local trial areas where relevant.
Division into cleaning, polishing, local repair, partial refurbishment or full restoration categories.
A reliable repair strategy depends on more than visual condition alone. Existing systems may include several generations of repairs, clear coat systems, protective treatments and undocumented modifications.
The assessment remains practical and proportionate. Its purpose is to identify the factors that materially influence cleaning, polishing, sanding, local repair, overcoating or complete refurbishment.
The survey information can be developed into a structured coating bidbook describing the observed condition, proposed repair category and technical requirements for each relevant area.
The objective is to provide enough clarity for yards and contractors to price the work consistently while keeping the document practical to use.
Collect specifications, repair history, maintenance information and refit objectives.
Inspect areas, document condition and carry out agreed measurements or testing.
Separate maintenance, local repair, partial refurbishment and full restoration.
Issue a structured scope for tendering, clarifications, comparison and planning.
Current condition, visible defects, representative photographs and key observations.
Deck-by-deck classification of proposed maintenance, repair or refurbishment.
Guidance on polishing, local repair, overcoating or wider system replacement.
A structured tender document with work scopes, inspection points and acceptance requirements.
Technical review of assumptions, exclusions, variations and contractor proposals.
Areas requiring trial work, opening-up, supplier input or further verification.
Reduce differences caused by contractors interpreting the scope differently.
Make exclusions, unknowns and optional work visible before award.
Support decisions on access, staging, protection and sequence.
State required workmanship, inspection points and coating expectations.
Reduce disputes by defining finish standards and visible repair expectations.
Provide a clearer basis for reviewing variations during the refit.
Ideally before the refit scope is tendered, so actual condition and uncertainties can be considered before budgets and quotations are finalised.
The scope can cover hull, superstructure, decks, bulwarks, mast areas, underwater systems, tanks or selected technical spaces.
Not always. The objective is to establish the relevant characteristics and uncertainties as far as practically possible.
Area schedules, condition descriptions, photographs, repair classifications, coating requirements, hold points, clarifications and acceptance criteria.
Yes. It gives invited yards and contractors a common technical basis for comparison.
Yes. Follow-up can include inspections, measurement verification, corrective-work review and final acceptance.
Provide the vessel location, planned refit period, available coating records and intended tender timeline for an initial discussion.